Zurück

Article 36 – prior consultation

What is prior consultation? Prior consultation is the obligation for a data controller to consult with the supervisory authority before carrying out processing activities that …

Zurück

What is prior consultation?

Prior consultation is the obligation for a data controller to consult with the supervisory authority before carrying out processing activities that are likely to result in a high risk to individuals’ rights and freedoms. It is a mechanism designed to ensure that the data controller seeks expert advice from the supervisory authority regarding the potential risks and appropriate safeguards associated with the processing activities.

When do I need prior consultation?

You need to consult the supervisory authority prior to processing where a data protection impact assessment indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken to mitigate the risk.

Georgine Berger

“First, the controller checks whether data processing may lead to an increased risk for the data subjects. Then, the controller must try to reduce the risk to an acceptable level by taking appropriate measures. If, despite all possible measures, a high residual risk cannot be ruled out, he must consult the supervisory authority.”

What information do I need to provide the supervisory authority?

When consulting the supervisory authority, you must provide the supervisory authority with:

  • where applicable, the respective responsibilities of the controller, joint controllers and processors involved in the processing, in particular for processing within a group of undertakings
  • the purposes and means of the intended processing
  • the measures and safeguards provided to protect the rights and freedoms of data subjects pursuant to the GDPR
  • the contact details of the data protection officer
  • the data protection impact assessment
  • any other information requested by the supervisory authority

Response options of the supervisory authority

If the authority concludes that the proposed processing does not comply with the GDPR, it has the following options:

  • issue appropriate written recommendations to the controller or, as the case may be, to the processor
  • exercise its powers referred to in Article 58 of the GDPR, such as issuing a warning or giving an order

What is the penalty for not consulting the supervisory authority?

The fine for not consulting the supervisory authority when required, can be up to €10 million or up to 2% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.

The specific penalties can be influenced by various factors, including the nature of the infringement, the cooperation of the organization, the measures taken to mitigate risks, and the previous compliance history of the organization. Each supervisory authority has the discretion to determine the appropriate penalty based on these factors.

FAQs

What happens if the supervisory authority is of the opinion that the intended processing infringes the GDPR?

If, in the course of its examination, the supervisory authority concludes that the planned processing does not comply with the GDPR, the authority can issue appropriate recommendations to the controller or processor, give a warning or an order. It also has the power to prohibit the processing operations entirely.

Within what period must the supervisory authority issue a recommendation?

The supervisory authority must provide advice within a period of up to eight weeks (which can be extended to up to 14 weeks).

At what point must the consultation be initiated?

The consultation with the supervisory authority must be initiated (but not completed) prior to processing.

Do I have to wait for a response by the supervisory authority before commencement of the processing operations?

According to the GDPR, the controller does not have to wait for a reaction of the supervisory authority before beginning with the processing operations. However, national laws may provide for an approval procedure in certain circumstances. In general, it is recommended to wait for a reaction of the supervisory authority.

Recommended Readings

Data Protection

Software distributor, Dedalus Biologie faced a 1.5 million fine for data breach and other GDPR violations.

The French Data Protection Authority had identified multiple GDPR infringements...

Data Protection

The EU-U.S. Data privacy Framework is here: U.S. companies can now self-certify to participate in cross-border transfers of personal data.

On July 10, 2023, the European Commission announced the adoption of its adequacy decision under the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (DPF)...

Data Protection

Five-digit fine for unlawful use of GPS tracking software in company vehicles

The Data Protection Authority of Bremen, Germany has imposed a five-digit...

Data Protection

The Italian data protection authority has imposed a fine of EUR 1.4 million on Douglas Italia S.p.a., a European beauty and cosmetics retailer for various GDPR violations.

Douglas asked their customers to give their consent to the privacy notes, the cookie policy, and the General Terms and Conditions all at once. The Data Protection Authority considered this a violation ...

Wo We Are

Savvy humans - good to know

Mariella Stubhan

Co-Founder/CEO

Georgine is specializing in data protection law and law with regards to new technology. She studied law at the University of Salzburg and at the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law (California).

Peter Harlander

Co-Founder/CEO

Peter Harlander is registered attorney both in Austria and Germany. He has dedicated his professional career as a lawyer for 20 years entirely to the legal aspects of data protection, IT, the internet, and marketing.

Sebstian Riedlmair

Co-Founder/CEO

Sebastian Riedlmair is specializing in various legal aspects, including data protection law and the legal implications of new technologies. As data protection attorney he brings a wealth of legal expertise to our team.

Matthias Redl

Co-Founder/CEO

Matthias is an experienced software architect and CEO of legal web GmbH, a company that implementing a legally compliant CMP. His expertise supports us in the areas of software architecture and development with regard to compliance and implementation of legal requirements.

Schedule a Free Video Call

Pick your preferred time-slot directly

legalweb.io
Privacy
Thank you for visiting dataprotectionofficer.io, the website of Formamentum Technology GmbH in Austria. We use technologies from partners (1) to provide our services. These include cookies and third-party tools to process some of your personal data. These technologies are not strictly necessary for the use of the website, but they do enable us to provide a better service and to interact more closely with you. You can adjust or withdraw your consent at any time.
asd as asd